Rieger & Fried LLP

New post-judgment spousal maintenance guidelines in New York State-Answers to the 5 most frequently asked questions

On September 25, 2015, New York State Governor Cuomo signed into law the new post-judgment maintenance guidelines bill ("new guidelines") which will revolutionize the manner in which the amount and duration of post-judgment spousal maintenance awards will be determined by attorneys and the Courts. Prior to the adoption of this bill, the amount and duration of maintenance were determined by a number of statutory factors without any precise methodology or formula. The new guidelines have introduced various mathematical formulas to provide the Family Law practitioner and the Courts with a greater certainty in arriving at an appropriate range for the amount and duration of spousal maintenance based upon income and the length of marriage measured up to the date of commencement. Notwithstanding the formula, arguments by either counsel can still be made that the award of maintenance is "unjust and inappropriate", requiring the Court to fashion an award that does not comport with the new guidelines. This article will highlight the most frequently asked questions from clients and other attorneys regarding the new guidelines.

(1) Q. When will the new guidelines become effective?

A. The new guidelines will become effective one hundred and twenty (120) days from September 25, 2015, the date that Governor Cuomo signed the bill into law. Therefore, the new guidelines will be effective on January 25, 2016. The new guidelines will not be applicable to any agreements or orders issued prior to January 25, 2016 or any proceedings commenced prior to January 25, 2016. Further, the new guidelines will not be a basis for a modification of a maintenance award issued prior to January 25, 2016.

(2) Q. What is the formula to determine the amount of post-judgment maintenance for a spouse paying both spousal maintenance and child support pursuant to the new guidelines?

A. In order to answer this question, please see the short hypothetical below:

John Doe, the non-custodial parent earns gross income of $129,941. Jane Doe, the custodial parent, earns $54,142. For this hypothetical, assume John will be responsible for paying spousal maintenance and child support to Jane.


At the outset, you must determine the respective incomes of the parties. Pursuant to the statute, "income" shall constitute income as defined in the Child Support Standards Act ("CSSA") without subtracting maintenance paid to a party spouse in an action. It will also include "income from income-producing property distributed or to be distributed in the action".

John's gross income is $129,941. Pursuant to CSSA, social security and medicare taxes (which constitutes 7.65% of his income) must be deducted from his gross income as demonstrated below:

$129,941 x .0765= $129,941 - $9,940.48= $120,000

Jane's gross income is $54,142. Pursuant to CSSA, social security and medicare taxes (which constitutes 7.65% of her income) must be deducted from her gross income as demonstrated below:

$54,142 x .0765= $54,142 - $ 4,141.86= $50,000.


Once the CSSA income for both parties are calculated, we can apply the new guideline formula to determine post-judgment spousal maintenance. For cases in which the payor spouse will be paying spousal maintenance AND child support, the following formula will be applicable:

STEP 1: 20% of Payor's Income up to $175,000 MINUS (-) 25% of Payee's Income

Applying the formula to this hypothetical would result in the following:

20% of $120,000= $24,000

- 25% of $ 50,000= $ 12,500


STEP 2: Payor's Income up to $175,000 PLUS (+) Payee's income TIMES (x) 40%

MINUS (-) Payee's Income

Applying this formula to this hypothetical would result in the following:

$120,000 + $50,000 x 40%= $170,000 x 40%= $68,000- $50,000= $18,000

STEP 3: Take the lower of the numbers from Step 1 and Step 2 which will be the guideline amount of post-judgment maintenance

In this example, the lower of the numbers would be $12,500 which would be the guideline amount of maintenance unless the Court deemed it "unjust and inappropriate"

(3) Q. How would maintenance be calculated under the guidelines if there is no child support being paid by the maintenance payor OR if the maintenance payor is the custodial parent?

A. In the example above, let's consider John Doe as the custodial parent who is responsible for paying spousal maintenance to Jane Doe. The formula changes a bit:

STEP 1: 30% of Payor's income up to $175,000 MINUS (-) 20% of Payee's Income.

Applying this formula to the hypothetical above provides the following result:

30% of $120,000 - 20% of $50,000= $36,000 - $10,000= $26,000

STEP 2: Payor's income up to $175,000 PLUS(+) Payee's income TIMES (x) 40%

MINUS Payee's Income

Applying this formula to the hypothetical above provides the following result:

$120,000 + $50,000= $170,000 x .4= $68,000- $50,000= $18,000

STEP 3: Take the lower of the numbers from Step 1 and Step 2 which will be the guideline amount of maintenance

In this example, the lower of the numbers would be $18,000 which would be the guideline amount of maintenance unless the Court deemed it "unjust and inappropriate".

(4) What if the payor's income exceeds $175,000? How is spousal maintenance pursuant to the new guidelines determined?

If the payor spouse's income is $200,000, the first step would be to calculate the maintenance up to the cap of $175,000 as we have done in the previous example. The Court thereafter has the discretion to take into consideration the additional $25,000 above the cap upon consideration of the following factors:

(1) The age and health of the parties

(2) The present or future earning capacity of the parties, including a history of limited participation in the workforce;

(3) The need of one party to incur education or training expenses;

(4) The termination of a child support award before the termination of the maintenance award when the calculation of maintenance was based upon child support being awarded which resulted in a maintenance award lower than it would have been had child support not been awarded;

(5) The wasteful dissipation of marital property, including transfers or encumbrances made in contemplation of a matrimonial action without fair consideration;

(6) The existence and duration of a pre-marital joint household or a pre-divorce separate household;

(7) Acts by one party against another that have inhibited or continue to inhibit a party's earning capacity or ability to obtain meaningful employment. Such acts include but are not limited to acts of domestic violence as provided in section four hundred fifty-nine of the social services law;

(8) The availability and cost of medical insurance for the parties;

(9) The care of children or stepchildren, disabled adult children or stepchildren, elderly parents or in-laws provided during the marriage that inhibits a party's earning capacity;

(10) The tax consequences to each party;

(11) The standard of living of the parties established during the marriage;

(12) The reduced or lost earning capacity of the payee as a result of having forgone or delayed education, training, employment or career opportunities during the marriage;

(13) The equitable distribution of marital property and the income or imputed income on the assets so distributed;

(14) The contributions and services of the payee as a spouse, parent, wage earner and homemaker and to the career or career potential of the other party; and

(15) Any other factor which the Court shall expressly find to be just and proper.

(5) Q. How does the new guidelines determine the duration of post-judgment maintenance?

A. The new guidelines has furnished an advisory durational formula for post-divorce maintenance which is directly linked to the "length of marriage" which is defined as running from the date of marriage until the date of commencement of the divorce action. The following is the advisory schedule for post-divorce maintenance:

Length of Marriage

% of length of marriage for which post-divorce maintenance will be payable

Zero to 15 years

15% to 30%

More than 15 to 20 years

30% to 40%

More than 20 years

35% to 50%

For example, if you are married seventeen (17) years, you could be responsible for paying between 5.1 years and 6.8 years of maintenance.

At Rieger & Fried, LLP, we represent individuals in deteriorating and in some cases abusive marriages who need to move on with their lives. At Rieger & Fried, LLP, we are not just aggressive litigators, but offer our clients compassion and understanding in these trying times. If you have any questions that need answers about your particular situation, we invite you to call our office and schedule an appointment or consultation. Call us at (516) 712-2268

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information


Read what others are saying about us!

  • "Rieger and Fried is the finest law firm to hire. I got the best outcome any client can hope for in a custody case: sole residential and legal custody of my two children. I hired the firm four years ago; my case was a highly contested interstate divorce and custody. The delay in my case was due to the opposing party. My case was handled by Michael Fried who is the most ethical professional I have met. Michael focused on facts of law and documentation to protect my children's legal rights. Michael is efficient, prompt, and helped me for years through the most difficult time of my life. The paperwork was filed on time. The motions were carefully researched and submitted. Michael made sure that he documented all communication with opposing counsel.

    Michael was involved in the evaluation of my ex-husband's medical practice, meeting with me and the forensic accountant. Michael is highly organized and detail-oriented. He tracked down the most important financial documentation to prove my ex-husband's income in order to determine child support.

    Michael prepared me for trial and was keen about details and how to highlight my role as the primary care giver for my children. I went through 16 days of trial during which Michael moved away from his family to stay in Brooklyn in order to meet with me daily before trial to review every single detail. He emailed me in the evenings to make sure all evidence was in place.

    When emotions ran high and opposing counsel was provocative during trial, Michael maintained his calm and represented me and my children wholeheartedly. Michael is the best lawyer any client can hope for, and I am ever so grateful that he handled my case."
  • So many people tell you, “Oh, I’ve got the BEST lawyer for you.â€? Or, “This guy is the absolutely the BEST lawyer to handle your case – the BEST!â€? When in a divorce situation, you hear a lot of this. But, when you are in a situation so foreign to any experience you have ever gone through, there is so much more that is important. It is not the lawyer, who may look great and have a career of flashy litigation. It all comes down to the entire TEAM of individuals working in your best interest. It comes down to their sincere dedication to every minor detail regarding your case, and, most importantly, understanding, and reacting to your mental frame-of-reference, sensitive to the fact that a divorce is one of the most traumatic events one can go through. This level of competence is the consistent apex at which Rieger & Fried operate each and every day. Not only is a successful outcome of the litigation an ultimate priority of the relationship — through over-the-top competence — but their understanding of a client’s well-being, who is probably completely out of their depth in a divorce proceeding, that really sets Rieger & Fried apart from all other firms. Hats off to Rieger & Fried… truly the BEST. SD
  • Kieth and Michael were instrumental in the positive and fair outcome of my case. From the start, they set realistic expectations. They fought hard on — and won — the critical issues that arose during the course of my case. I am extremely happy with their services; I highly recommend them! Melissa J.
  • Michael Fried was very professional and supportive during a very difficult period in my life. He worked very hard to look out for my interests while trying to come to a fair and equitable agreement. I would highly recommend him. Cathy C.
  • Kieth Rieger navigated my divorce with the expertise of a highly skilled negotiator. He is the consummate divorce attorney: determined, effective and compassionate. Rebecca H.
  • Keith headed the team that navigated me through the most difficult time of my life. My divorce was very lengthy and uglier than most. Keith litigated brilliantly and made certain the outcome would be just and fair. Karen D.
  • The Firm Rieger & Fried handled all my family concerns with the utmost respect and professionalism. Joshua Rieger is not just a attorney with the vast knowledge of Matrimonial law and Family Law, he is in tune with his clients , and understands the important challenges they face. The Firm Rieger & Fried protected my interests from start to finish ,and are truly a cut above the rest. Jason B.
  • Kieth Rieger is a superior attorney and I was able to benefit from his ability to process large volumes of information quickly and formulate effective strategy. Kieth was extremely accommodating and sensitive when he represented my case yet firm and commanding when warranted. Soo L.
  • Let’s face it, going through a divorce can be long and nerve-wracking process during which you can be excruciatingly vulnerable. Keith proved to be the sharp, savvy, efficient, frugal and empathetic attorney I needed to be able to achieve a timely and favorable outcome. Jay E.
  • As a fellow attorney, I was aware of your reputation as a skilled and highly regarded matrimonial lawyer. Your representation of my interests in my own divorce confirmed what I had heard; I received outstanding counsel. Thank you for your advice and guidance and for an excellent result. Richard R.
  • When I considered getting a divorce, I wanted to assert my rights while at the same time making sure I wasn’t being unfair to my spouse, and preserving the good relationship I had with my children. You took the time to understand what I was hoping to achieve, and dealt fairly with me and with my spouse. I understand that matrimonial law is inherently adversarial, but I felt that you helped keep it from being more adversarial than absolutely necessary. The end result: a settlement in which both sides got what we needed, in which my parenting relationship with my ex is a productive and civil one, and in which the children are comfortable and cared for. It’s hard to be excited about a divorce, particularly one that ends up in the courts, but you made it as fair and painless as possible, and I thank you for it. Jonathan W.
  • Kieth Rieger made me realize the divorce process is not about showmanship in the courtroom but simply the facts. Eric W.
  • Despite the reputation of divorce lawyers’ being heartless and all about the money, Kieth Rieger was kind, compassionate and willing to work with me financially. When I had a problem making a payment he didn’t threaten to drop me as a client but rather came up with a fair and reasonable payment arrangement. Sharon S.
  • Kieth Rieger and Michael Fried handled my recent marriage litigation. During the entire process both were very professional and always available to answer my many questions. I would highly recommend both if you have this type of litigation. Patrick P.
  • Faced with a contentious divorce 12 years ago, I turned to Kieth Rieger to represent me. I found not only brilliant legal advice, but strong support and calming guidance that came at a critical time. All these years later I returned to him to help me write a pre-nup agreement as I begin a new life. He is a trusted professional who I have recommended many, many times. Amy D.
  • Keith Rieger , My Superlawyer, who checked his ego at the door, rolled up his sleeves, fought for me and my girls, and won in the end. If you want a smart, honest, hardworking lawyer who really cares about his clients, look no further. Lauren L.
  • Going through my divorce was very draining and emotional. Kieth helped me through this time in my life, he made me feel comfortable and at ease that everything would be fine. He and his staff treated me as if I was family. It turned out just the way he said it would. I would recommend this firm to family, friends and anyone that needs a Divorce attorney. Mr. Rieger and associates are hardworking, caring and extremely intelligent. Thank you for giving me a new beginning! Sharyn S.
  • Keith Rieger helped me tremendously during a very difficult divorce. He worked with me financially, and had great empathy for my situation. Your great legal and personal advice were invaluable. Maryanne J.
  • Kieth Rieger guided me through my divorce with incredible professionalism, insight and expertise. Kieth worked tirelessly to achieve the resolution I desired and did everything in his power to realize that outcome efficiently. I highly recommend Keith and the team at Rieger & Fried LLP. Stephen E.
  • Rieger & Fried LLP helped me every step of the way in the process of my divorce. They were adept at walking me through all of the potential options that were available for me. They were focused on resolving our marital issues fairly and with a sense of dignity rarely seen in this field of law. Brian M.